Much of this week’s issue has been given over to articles covering the debate now raging over file sharing. With the new wave of imminent litigation, now expected in the UK as well as the US, coupled with the new report refuting the claims of the RIAA and BPI, there is no hotter topic in the industry right now.
With the latest report published showing that the effect of file sharing on record sales is minimal, even beneficial in certain sectors, surely litigation against consumers is a waste of time, money and energy that would be better spent in speeding up the process of legitimising file sharing and downloading and developing new artists whose music people will want to buy?
More and more the indication is that there are many other factors involved in the decline of record sales, such as the bland, homogenised ‘play-list’ culture which the public has simply had enough of, overpricing and competition from other forms of entertainment.
To many independent labels, file sharing is a great ‘playing field – leveller’, giving them access to a distribution and marketing network other than the usual channels sewn up by the major media corporations. To criminalise file sharing, as they are attempting to do in the US, is to put a stranglehold on this burgeoning new distribution system, controlled by the major trade bodies..
This brings freedom of information into question. Lumping file sharing in with terrorism, child pornography and crime is a way of making it easier for politicians to pass laws against products that are popular with their constituents and unpopular with the corporations that finance their political campaigns.
This is perhaps an issue too deep to fully explore here but one that we all need to be aware of. Label:Life believes that there are agendas being played out here other than preventing the loss of record sales.
Whilst Label:Life is absolutely in agreeance with the RIAA and BPI’s claims that rights holders should be fairly compensated for their works, suing a small portion of potential customers is simply not the way forward. There is a whole generation of kids who simply do not go to record shops as they are used to getting music for free on the internet. Perhaps it would be better to educate them rather than litigate against them. If there was an affordable way for them to legitimately buy music over the net, they would.
Let’s not forget, many people are simply not satisfied with a mis-labelled, poor quality album download, or a copied cd with felt tip on. People still want a product, something they can hold. Label:Life doesn’t believe that ‘physical’ product is dead, just too expensive and often mediocre. However, digital product is here to stay, so the sooner cross-border licensing issues are resolved and legitimate file sharing models such as Weedshare are embraced, the better and we can all get on with the business of making, selling and enjoying music. -ED